General information on ranking
Name of the ranking | THE Japan University Rankings |
---|---|
Geographical scope | general ranking |
Name of person in charge of ranking | Phil Baty |
E-mail of person in charge of ranking | |
Website of the ranking | https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/japa... |
Publication frequency | annual |
First year of publication | 2017 |
Most recent year of publication | 2023 |
Date of last update | 2024-10-20 |
Ranking organization | Times Higher Education |
Website of the methodology | https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/japan-university-rankings-2023-methodology |
Methodology | The Times Higher Education Japan University Rankings use a balanced scorecard approach, with 16 individual performance indicators combining to create an overall score that reflects the broad strength of an institution. The overall methodology explores four key areas, which are called pillars: RESOURCES
ENGAGEMENT This pillar measures opinions of the university from two sources: the High School Advisors Survey and the Japan Student Survey. The High School Advisors Survey gathers the views of student careers advisers from between 1,000 and 2,000 Japanese secondary schools each year. It asks advisers to name the top 15 universities that they believe teach students to the highest global standards (6%), and the 15 universities that they think are best at developing students’ abilities (6%). Responses to seven questions are used in three metrics in the following manner:
OUTCOMES This pillar looks at the overall academic reputation (8%) of the university in Japan, based on votes from Japanese scholars in THE’s annual Academic Reputation Survey of leading academics worldwide, which helps to determine which institutions have the best reputation for excellence in teaching. The reputation of the university among employers (8%) is also considered to get a sense of whether the university produces graduates the market wants. This is based on a survey of human resources departments from 815 listed and non-listed companies. ENVIRONMENT This pillar looks at the make-up of the student and staff body at each campus, helping students to determine whether they will find themselves in a diverse, supportive and inclusive university environment. The following indicators are considered:
|
Additional information
- Type of publication: internet, print - magazine, newspaper
- Internet users access to ranking: open access
- Main target groups: students and parents, higher education institutions
- Level of comparison: institutional: 271
- Major dimensions covered: internationalization, reputation, research, teaching
- Structure of presentation: standard presentation (league tables)
- Data sources: data collected from HEIs by ranking organization, survey conducted exclusively by ranking organization, data collected from HEIs by third party agencies: the Japanese government, third-party database (data not provided by HEI): Scopus, Benesse Corporation, Nikkei Human Resources
- Quality assurance of ranking: advisory board
- Website of the ranking organization: https://www.timeshighereducation.com
- Types of the ranking organization: commercial/for-profit (incl. media)